The Smartwatch Showdown: Apple Watch SE 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 165 – A Tale of Two Philosophies
When it comes to budget smartwatches, the Apple Watch SE 3 and Garmin Forerunner 165 are often pitted against each other. But personally, I think this comparison is less about which device is better and more about understanding the fundamentally different philosophies behind them. One thing that immediately stands out is how these two brands cater to distinct user needs—Apple leans into the lifestyle and connectivity space, while Garmin doubles down on fitness and endurance.
The Price Point Paradox
Both watches start at $249, which is a clever move by both brands to capture the budget-conscious market. But what many people don’t realize is that this price point hides some significant trade-offs. For instance, the Apple Watch SE 3’s $249 tag only gets you the smaller 40mm model without cellular. Want something bigger or more connected? You’re looking at an additional $30 to $50. Garmin, on the other hand, offers a ‘Music’ edition for $299, which feels like a niche upsell but could be a game-changer for runners who want offline tunes.
From my perspective, this pricing strategy reveals a lot about each brand’s priorities. Apple is betting on users wanting a seamless, connected experience, while Garmin is targeting fitness enthusiasts who value functionality over frills.
Design: Form vs. Function
The design differences between these watches are subtle but telling. The Garmin Forerunner 165 has a slightly raised bezel, which might seem like a minor detail, but it’s a clear nod to durability—something fitness-focused users appreciate. Apple, meanwhile, opts for a sleeker, bezel-less design that aligns with its minimalist aesthetic.
What makes this particularly fascinating is how these choices reflect broader cultural trends. Apple’s design language is all about blending technology into everyday life, while Garmin’s is about equipping you for the rigors of physical activity. It’s not just about looks; it’s about purpose.
Fitness Tracking: Where Garmin Pulls Ahead
If you take a step back and think about it, the real battle here is in fitness tracking. While the Apple Watch SE 3 offers decent tools, Garmin’s Forerunner 165 is in a league of its own. Features like adaptive training tips, recovery time recommendations, and heart rate variability (HRV) insights are not just nice-to-haves—they’re essential for serious athletes.
A detail that I find especially interesting is Garmin’s Morning Reports. They don’t just tell you how you slept; they tie it to your training outlook and HRV status. This holistic approach is what sets Garmin apart. Apple’s Workout Buddy is great for motivation, but it feels more like a beginner’s tool compared to Garmin’s advanced analytics.
Smart Features: Apple’s Unmatched Ecosystem
Here’s where Apple flips the script. The SE 3’s smart features are lightyears ahead of the Forerunner 165. Access to the App Store, built-in apps like Apple Maps and Walkie-Talkie, and the ability to take calls directly from your wrist—these are features that make the Apple Watch feel like an extension of your iPhone.
What this really suggests is that Apple isn’t just selling a smartwatch; it’s selling a lifestyle. Garmin, on the other hand, seems content with offering basic smart features like NFC payments and onboard music storage. It’s a stark contrast that highlights Apple’s focus on connectivity and Garmin’s on performance.
Safety and Battery Life: The Final Pieces of the Puzzle
Both watches take safety seriously, but Apple edges out with features like Emergency SOS and Check In. These aren’t just gimmicks—they’re potentially life-saving tools. Garmin’s LiveTrack and Incident Detection are impressive, but Apple’s integration with emergency services feels more comprehensive.
Battery life, however, is where Garmin wins hands down. Eleven days of battery life compared to Apple’s 18 hours? That’s not just a difference; it’s a chasm. This raises a deeper question: are we willing to trade longevity for connectivity?
The Bigger Picture: What This Comparison Really Means
In my opinion, the Apple Watch SE 3 and Garmin Forerunner 165 aren’t competitors in the traditional sense. They’re representatives of two distinct approaches to wearable technology. Apple is for the user who wants a seamless, connected experience, while Garmin is for the user who prioritizes performance and endurance.
If you’re a casual user who values staying connected and tracking occasional workouts, the Apple Watch is your best bet. But if fitness is your primary focus, Garmin’s Forerunner 165 is the clear winner.
What many people don’t realize is that the choice between these two watches isn’t just about features—it’s about aligning with your lifestyle. And that, in my opinion, is the most important takeaway.
